Wacky interview techniques - do they actually work?
Perusing some of the recent press articles about how companies inundated with applicants are trying to differentiate between them by using what can only be described as wacky interview techniques, it got me thinking…
Granted, if I were in the situation where everyone wanted to work for me and I only wanted to hire the most capable, I’d be creative in my approach, but are these interview questions actually effective to find the right people or are they just headline grabbing?
For me, it’s about going back to basics – what is the point of interviews? Really they’re about uncovering information about someone’s intellect, skills and ability to help decide whether they’ll fit into a company’s culture and be able to do a superlative job, now and in the future.
One of the articles I read was about Saatchi and Saatchi, who are offering potential graduate trainees a chance to give a 30 second elevator pitch about why they should hire them. On the face of it this is a headline grabber, the only applicants who’ll ace the test are your sales and marketing people. But Saatchi and Saatchi have actually hit the nail on the head as they are recruiting for their shopper marketing division, so this type of assessment is ideal. To me it also gives a great flavour of the fun and creative culture at Saatchi and identifies who will best fit in.
The creative interview techniques I’m less sure about are questions such as “tell me about your favourite biscuit” or “if you were an animal what would you be”. To me these questions don’t uncover the ability or skills that an interviewer may be looking for, or give an applicant a flavour of the business they’d be working for. They are pointless, often thought up by companies who haven’t taken the time to think about the profile of the individuals who will really drive their business in the future and how best to assess it at interview. The risk is that you end up taking on applicants who are all the same, great at sales and communication, as they can answer these questions amusingly, but lacking in other skills. Businesses that succeed tend to be diverse and have teams of people who bring a range of backgrounds and experiences to the table.
Google are renowned for their challenging and often off the wall assessment techniques, but where their approach differs is that the questions, for example “how would you weigh your head” or “what number comes next in this sequence…” are designed to assess the problem solving skills and intellectual abilities that Google look for in their new recruits. Applicants undergo a whole range of assessments as well as meeting people who work for the business. From my experience, it’s companies who this type of scientific approach to assessing candidates’ skills and ability, rather than using wacky techniques, who are more likely to make the right decisions.
So, there’s a place for wacky interview techniques, but a business uses them at their peril if there is no link between the type of assessment and making informed decisions about the hires with the ability to drive future business success.
Ruth Miller is Director of rma, supporting businesses with advice on talent acquisition, and jobseekers with Career counselling and CV Writing. If you need advice on how to market yourself effectively to find a new job get in touch. www.being-brand-you.co.uk